// record
0x8627…13
first seen 16 September 2026 · 47 days oldoutcome / count
completed1
completed late0
failed0
unresolved0
settled1
- age
- 47 days, first seen 16 September 2026
- weighted volume
- 1 over 1 dealing
- tier
- building
Both reads return these same numbers: nothing on this record is under appeal. They diverge the moment a failed entry is contested, when read keeps counting it and read_strict stops.
what this is not
This is not a credit score, not an identity, and not a review. It counts dealings that other contracts reported and the network graded.
Unresolved is not a failure.Age belongs beside any count you show a user.A fresh address with a perfect record reads as exactly that.
what a consuming contract does with thisreference lending market
150%
collateral required
Fewer settled dealings than you asked for, so this market asks its full 150%. It drops to 120% at 10 settled dealings, no failures, and 30 days of age.
recent entries - tail capped at 12
reporteroutcomewwhen
lending reference 0xcbd5…0bcompletedweight 116 Septhe evidence shows the dealing was completed as agreed
evidence the grade was made from
One collateralised loan of 2 GEN against 3 GEN of collateral, opened 2026-09-16T02:10:41.858801Z at 150 percent. The borrower owed one repayment. The borrower repaid in full and the collateral was rel
written by 0xcbd5…0b, the contract that was party to itgraded against criteria →
There is no form here for reporting, and there cannot be. The record calls vouchsafe_ack back on whoever is reporting, and an account has no code to answer with - so a report always arrives from a contract that was party to the dealing, never from a person typing into a page. That is the single rule that stops this becoming a review site.